Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Jesús rompe la ley

Jesús: profeta y rebelde
Antes, cuando se hablaba en las iglesias sobre cuál era la meta principal del programa de educación cristiana no era problemático afirmar que una de las razones era llevar a las personas a conocer, amar y seguir a Jesús. Sin embargo, en los tiempos que estamos viviendo, quizás debemos preguntarnos a qué Jesús queremos que nuestra gente siga.

Me explico. Una de las preocupaciones que tengo en estos momentos surge al percibir que algunas personas afiliadas a la iglesia están tratando de «domar» el espíritu indomable de Jesús. El Jesús de amor o el Jesús amigo ha sido enfatizado de tal manera, que el Jesús profeta y rebelde queda invisibilizado ante los ojos de la iglesia y del mundo. Cuando leo las críticas de personas no afiliadas a la iglesia o no creyentes, veo críticas al Jesús personal, que vino solamente a salvarme a mi y a ti. Pero no creo que Dios se haya hecho humano simplemente para que yo aceptara a Jesús como salvador personal, sino a salvar, redefinir y a reformar sistemas y culturas humanas que no viven de acuerdo a los valores del reino de Dios. Por eso, cuando veo pasajes como Lucas 13:10-17 pienso en que debemos tener cuidado con el Jesús que presentamos al mundo.

En este pasaje, el acercamiento tradicional ha sido prestar atención a lo que Jesús hace por la mujer encorvada. Él ve a una mujer que ha estado encorvada por 18 años y la restaura. La conclusión del sermón es que Jesús puede sanarnos, o si queremos dar más simbolismo teológico a la historia, puede enderezar o poner en orden nuestras vidas encorvadas. Sin embargo, estos acercamientos sirven a la ola de individualismo en la que nada nuestra sociedad desde hace unos cuantos años. 

Jesús viene a salvar, no solo a la mujer encorvada, sino al sistema que la ha estado ignorando y rechazando por 18 años. Y es que Jesús es mucho más intencional de lo que pensamos, y tiene una agenda escondida que en ocasiones no miramos o no queremos mirar. Lucas menciona dos detalles importantes que no debemos ignorar en este pasaje... porque los escritores usualmente mencionan estos detalles para revelar múltiples motivos y propósitos en una historia.

Jesús en la sinagoga
Lucas comienza el pasaje estableciendo contexto: «Jesús enseñaba en una de las sinagogas en el sábado».  Usualmente, cuando una persona quiere hacer algo sin que nadie lo sepa, no va a un lugar público a hacerlo. Jesús fue a la sinagoga que era el lugar central de la vida judía de su tiempo. Allí se reunían los jefes de su comunidad. Era el lugar de noticias y de autoridad. Por lo tanto, lo primero que Lucas nos comunica es que Jesús no esconde su ministerio. Su interés no es que lo que está haciendo sea un movimiento clandestino, sino que quiere que sus palabras y sus acciones sean parte de la fibra de su comunidad.

Lo segundo que Lucas nos dice es que Jesús estaba enseñando en el sábado. El sábado, es también conocido como el Día del Señor o Día de reposo. Esta celebración es parte del ADN de la religión judía y es uno de los diez mandamientos que Dios da a su pueblo a través de Moisés. El mandamiento es uno de los más largos y detallados: «Acuérdate del día sábado para santificarlo. Seis días trabajarás y harás toda tu obra, pero el séptimo día será sábado para el SEÑOR tu Dios. No harás en él obra alguna, ni tú, ni tu hijo, ni tu hija, ni tu esclavo, ni tu esclava, ni tu animal, ni el forastero que está dentro de tus puertas. Porque en seis días el SEÑOR hizo los cielos, la tierra y el mar, y todo lo que hay en ellos, y reposó en el séptimo día. Por eso el SEÑOR bendijo el día sábado y lo santificó» (Éxodo 20,8-11).

De acuerdo a algunas páginas de internet de la comunidad judía, había 39 cosas que la gente judía no debía hacer en el sábado, entre ellas: sembrar, arar, cosechar, atar gavillas (muchas cosas relacionadas con la cosecha); hacer dos bucles, entretejer dos sogas, dividir dos sogas (y cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con el uso de las dos sogas, no pregunten por qué); capturar un venado o cualquier preparación de dicho venado; escribir dos cartas, borrar para escribir dos cartas; construir, derribar, extinguir, encender, golpear con un martillo, etc.

Obviamente, cuando recibimos mandamientos y leyes, una de las primeras cosas que el ser humano hace es interpretar esa ley para ver que aplica y que no. Hay que preguntar de qué obras está hablando Dios. Hay que averiguar cuál es el periodo específico de tiempo (horas, minutos, segundos). Hay que decir cuáles son las implicaciones de reposar. Nos gozamos en encontrar ambigüedades y tecnicismos, fisuras o resquicios. Dentro de lo blanco y negro, nos gusta buscar lo gris. Recuerdo un pensamiento del Rvdo. Dr. David Cortes Fuentes que afirma algo como que Dios nos había dado 10 mandamientos... y que el ser humano los había convertido en más de 300. Sólo Jesús pudo venir a recordarnos que todos nuestros inventos legales pueden ser resumidos en dos mandamientos: Ama a Dios y ama a tu prójimo.

Así que, cuando Jesús restaura la vida de esta pobre mujer que ha estado doblada durante 18 años, él doblega la ley para hacerlo (esta es una traducción de la Rvda. Magdalena García de un juego de palabras en las que pensé en inglés: Jesus heals the bent over woman by bending the rules). Y la reacción del líder de la sinagoga no nos debe sorprender: el principal de la sinagoga se enojó (otras versiones usan palabras como se enfureció, se puso furibundo o se indignó) y dijo, «Seis días hay en la semana en los cuales se debe trabajar. Vengan, pues, en estos días y sean sanados, y no en el día de sábado». Noten que el principal de la sinagoga no le habla directamente a Jesús. A eso le llaman triangulación en  dinámicas familiares: una situación en la que un miembro de la familia «no se comunica» directamente con otro miembro de la familia, pero sí se comunica con un tercer miembro de la familia. También podríamos llamarle intimidación o chisme. El principal de la sinagoga no se atreve a hablarle directamente a Jesús.

La realidad es que, si nos ponemos a pensar, Jesús pudo haber esperado para no causar tanto revuelo. Si la mujer había esperado 18 años, pudo haber esperado un día más. Jesús pudo haber hecho este milagro en otro lugar que no fuera la sinagoga. Sin embargo, Jesús no vino solamente a este mundo a dar gracia y sanidad individual, sino que vino a impactar todas las estratas de la creación. Y por lo tanto, vino para romper las leyes que no estaban funcionando de acuerdo a la voluntad de Dios para el mundo. Y él doblego las reglas, cada vez que estás tenían como resultado la injusticia y la muerte, y no la a justicia y la vida.

Nuestro concepto de la ley
Es irónico que después de la llegada de Jesús al mundo, todavía la humanidad tiene problemas con su concepto de la ley vs. los valores del reino de Dios. Esto es así porque todavía nos inventamos leyes que son injustas y que nos llevan a encarcelar, empobrecer y oprimir a sectores específicos de la comunidad. Estas son leyes que llevan a situaciones de oscuridad y muerte.

Hay ocasiones en que nos inventamos leyes que años después nos hacen reír. Por ejemplo, aquí en Kentucky, hay leyes que afirman que una persona, por ley, debe bañarse una vez al año, que una mujer, por ley, puede casarse con el mismo hombre solamente tres veces, y que es ilegal cazar cualquier animal desde la ventana de un carro en movimiento, exceptuando las ballenas... uno puede dispararle a una ballena desde un carro en movimiento en Kentucky.

A pesar de que sabemos que hay leyes ridiculas y hasta malas, seguimos enseñando a nuestros hijos e hijas que romper la ley es malo, sin agregar que en ocasiones hay leyes que deben ser cambiadas y retadas, porque han traído confusión, favoritismo y sufrimiento a las personas. El gobierno, tanto nacional como estatal de los Estados Unidos ha pasado leyes que le han quitado tierras sagradas a la población nativo-americana, que han metido a la comunidad japonesa en campos de confinamiento, que le han prohibido el matrimonio a personas de diferentes colores de piel, que han limitado el derecho al voto a las mujeres y la comunidad afro-americana y que han cuartado los derechos de la comunidad LBGTQ+, entre otras. Muchas de estas leyes han cambiado porque se han levantado voces proféticas que las han cuestionado. Más sin embargo, seguimos levantado el asunto de la legalidad, cada vez que queremos salirnos con nuestro punto de vista, como cuando hablamos del derecho a tener armas o del tema de la inmigración. La ley humana no es perfecta y nunca lo será. La ley humana debe ser medida con la vara que propone el Jesús profeta y rebelde.

Jesús, el profeta rebelde le contesta al principal de la sinagoga de esta manera: «¡Hipócrita! ¿No desata cada uno de ustedes en sábado su buey o su asno del pesebre y lo lleva a beber? Y esta, siendo hija de Abraham, a quien Satanás ha tenido atada por dieciocho años, ¿no debía ser librada de esta atadura en el día de sábado?». El líder de la sinagoga es un hipócrita por defender una ley que permite que demostremos compasión por un animal, mas no permite que demostremos la misma compasión por una mujer enferma.

El sábado: Una celebración de vida
Jesús, el profeta rebelde que rompe la ley nos reta a mirar las leyes a nuestro alrededor y a discernir si son leyes de vida o leyes de muerte. Nos reta a evaluar si son leyes de celebración o leyes de luto... y también nos llama a no quedarnos en silencio, a no escondernos y a defender el lado de la vida y la celebración.

El Rvdo. Noe Juarez, en su comentario sobre este pasaje nos recuerda estas palabras del teólogo Darío López Rodríguez que describe este milagro de Jesús «en el día de reposo como un culto verdadero, como una celebración de la vida». Él dice que «La sanidad de una mujer enferma, deja constancia que el día de reposo es tiempo para celebrar la vida». La ley judía había convertido el día del reposo en un día de legalismo y de ambiguedad, en donde una mujer podía permanecer atada y un animal podía ser desatado. Al lidiar con las injusticias legales de este mundo, Jesús nos recuerda que el verdadero sábado nos invita a celebrar, a bailar, a cantar, nos invita a vivir en libertad y en la paz que solo existe cuando hay verdadera justicia.

Recientemente, en mi país de origen, Puerto Rico, la gente se levantó en contra del gobernador y de su gobierno. La gente levantó su voz ante lo que pensaron fue un comportamiento injusto e indigno. Muchas otras personas hablaron de que el gobernador tenía derecho a permanecer en su puesto porque había sido elegido por el pueblo. Todo era legal. El mismo gobernador dijo que no había roto ninguna ley. Sin embargo, quizás no siguió la más básica de las leyes: Ama a Dios y ama a tu prójimo. Ciertamente, sus palabras lo condenaron. Y el pueblo pidió su renuncia y él... renunció.

Una multitud enorme se levantó para denunciarlo. Levantaron sus voces en público y fueron a la «sinagoga», buscando enderezar a una isla que llevaba encorvada durante mucho tiempo. Sin embargo, y esto me encanta, lo hicieron danzando, cantando, marchando. Lo hicieron agarrando cacerolas, ollas y potes y dándoles a golpes al ritmo de la justicia, la dignidad y la libertad. El pueblo reclamó y celebró la vida a la que tienen derecho. Y espero que los potes sigan sonando, porque hay mucho trabajo por hacer.

Todos estos acontecimientos me recuerdan al Jesús profeta y rebelde, al Jesús que marcha, protesta y doblega leyes y al que enderaza los caminos torcidos de la ambición y el abuso. Y también me recuerdan que, cómo cristiana, tengo que marchar, protestar y denunciar lo que está encorbado, sea gente o leyes... para luego poder anunciar con gozo que la familia de Dios ya ha sido establecida completamente en la tierra.

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Send Him Back!

Send him back!
He dares to criticize Judaism, telling us the laws are wrong.

Send him back!
He challenges Levites and Pharisees in front of the people.

Send him back!
He hangs out with fishermen, with sick people, with SINNERS!

Send him back!
He is a troublemaker and Rome will punish us.

Send him back!
He cries for Jerusalem because he says that it kills prophets.

Send him back!
Because every word he says is the truth, and his words uncover our lies. 

Send him back!
Back to Nazareth, because nothing good comes out of there.

Send him back!
Because he dares to love God, to live God... and denounces us, making us look bad. 

Send him back... back to God the Father... who sees us, what we've become... and cries. 

Saturday, June 9, 2018

ORDER AND JUSTICE

Are We More Devoted to Order Than To Justice?

I’ve been reading a book lately that I shared with the session and the leadership of the church yesterday. It’s called The Pentecost Paradigm: Ten Strategies for Becoming a Multiracial Congregation. In it, Jacqueline J. Lewis and John Janka wrote a sentence that caught my attention: “Any congregation—white, black or otherwise—that is ‘more devoted to order than to justice’ and disengaged from breaking down the dividing walls of hostility has lost its way.”


The phrase “more devoted to order than to justice” drew me in… because as a Presbyterian, I have heard the slogan “decently and in order” plenty of times. So I wanted to explore the invitation to look at the concepts of order and justice a little bit further.


That particular phrase was not written by the authors of the book, but by someone who has become more and more of a spiritual mentor of mine: Martin Luther King. His words seem to appear more and more lately in my own reflections as a Christian Presbyterian, especially when I see more and more people emphasizing our differences as markers of inferiority and unworthiness, or saying that we are a nation of "law and order" in order (redundancy implied) to oppress others that are different from the supposedly dominant culture. 


In the Letter from a Birmingham Jail  Dr. King writes: “I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council of the Ku Klux Klan, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.”


Jesus does things intentionally

As I look at Matthew 12: 1-14, I question what Jesus would have thought about moderate followers.

Here we have one of two Sabbath controversy stories, where Jesus is questioning what is lawful to do on a Sabbath and the relationship of humanity to the Sabbath.



What is the Sabbath? Remember that Sabbath is a weekly day of rest or time of worship given in the Bible as the seventh day. The Ten Commandments prohibit doing any work on the Sabbath, and Jewish law prohibits doing any form of work on Shabbat.  There are 39 categories of activity that the Talmud prohibits; things like… sowing, plowing, reaping, building, writing two or more letters, erasing two or more letters, demolishing, extinguishing a fire, or kindling a fire (no barbeques on the Sabbath).


So we find Jesus and the disciples, during a Sabbath day doing something they are not supposed to be doing: the disciples pluck some of the heads of grain, a practice that apparently is permitted to hungry travelers by the law. Then we read about some Pharisees confronting Jesus about the disciples' behavior, arguing that they were reaping on the Sabbath, in violation of the prohibition against work.


Jesus then decides to turn the tables on the Pharisees by mentioning one of the great men of Israel: King David. David had eaten the sacred bread of the temple when he was in need. If David could do that, his disciples could pluck the heads of grain. Done. Case closed. Jesus wins the argument. 


Wendy Farley, a professor at San Francisco Theological Seminary, has a very interesting take on this passage. She starts by defending the Pharisees by saying that Jesus is intentionally provoking a confrontation. She says this story “is not about how urgent need permits us to break the rules.”


Then... what is it about? I believe that she has a point. This passage does not state that the disciples were hungry so the comparison to David does not ring true. And the other part of the passage where Jesus cures a man with a withered hand? She says Jesus could have waited until sundown.


She also states it would have been easy for Jesus and his disciples to honor the Sabbath… so that leaves the question... why does Jesus decide to violate a law that is part of the Ten Commandments and that has been ordained by God? Her answer is that “by refusing to observe conventions for honoring the Sabbath, Jesus invites us into a form of faith in which time-honored practices are relativized by healing power, compassion, and joy.” This conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees, she says “contrasts religion that hardens hearts with the gospel that opens hearts to the ubiquitous presence of God and gives birth to compassion and joy.”


A contrasting story

This passage is a story about contrasts. Jesus is questioning the very fabric of his religion and proposing a new way to do things. He proposes functioning out of grace, compassion and joy, and not out of rules and regulations… not out of order, but out of justice.

After all, Jesus’ conclusion to this argument is “The Sabbath was created for humans; humans weren’t created for the Sabbath. This is why the Human One is Lord even over the Sabbath.” If the Sabbath serves to oppress and to punish, then it loses its purpose and way.


Back to order and justice

As I look at the Christian family today… I wonder how this passage challenges us as Christians and as the body of Christ. As I said before, one of the things that I grew up within the church is that Presbyterians do things “decently and in order”. But if we look at Jesus, and what he does in this passage… I’m not sure that he was an “order” kind of guy. He was decent… and his decency leads him to challenge his followers to make sure that the laws that ruled their lives were more about compassion, grace, justice and human wellbeing than about keeping order in the land.

I believe that Jesus was calling the Pharisees and those who followed him, to challenge values, laws, and lifestyles that enslaved, oppressed, punished and diminished their society. And that Jesus is calling us as church to do that today. 
Going back to Martin Luther King… He said ““The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state.”


I'm not alone in this belief. There are a group of leaders that have felt the need to reclaim the Jesus that fought against systems that want to pass order as justice. 
Based on Jesus and his actions in passages like this… and on Martin Luther King’s words, a group of leaders from different churches decided to write a confession. They said “Our urgent need, in a time of moral and political crisis, is to recover the power of confessing our faith. Lament, repent, and then repair. If Jesus is Lord, there is always space for grace. We believe it is time to speak and to act in faith and conscience, not because of politics, but because we are disciples of Jesus Christ—to whom be all authority, honor, and glory.” 


They may not include everyone that could be included... but their invitation rings true. We need to be a church that does things decently and with justice, discerning carefully if the current law of the land is serving political and social agendas that are intended for oppression and destruction of "the other". Any law that incites fear, that does not show mercy, that is not measured by the grace shown by Jesus Christ, must be questioned and changed if need be. We have done this before. Jim Crow laws have been challenged and erased. Laws that sought to punish the Japanese people that lived for generations in the United States were challenged and changed. We are the conscience of the state. We are disciples of Jesus Christ... the same one that challenged the law and that opened the way to a new relationship with God and with one another.  
























Saturday, January 13, 2018

Resolute

Sermon based on Luke 2: 22-40, preached on the First Sunday of Christmas (December 31, 2017)


     

Resolutions

Well we are down to the last day of 2017… and so our mind goes to a review of how the year has gone… and to the famous lists of resolutions for the new year that usually fall to the wayside after about one month… or maybe one week.

On Facebook, Ellen shared an article called “50 Healthy Resolutions That Aren’t Losing Weight” and of course my curiosity was peaked… because that is the one resolution that I make each and every year. I read through them, and some are very good... but that lead to a question. What are resolutions anyway? What does that word even mean? So, I went to the dictionary and found several definitions that caught my attention. 
The act of resolving or determining upon an action, course of action, method, procedure, etc.

A resolve; a decision or determination: to make a firm resolution to do something.

The mental state or quality of being resolved or resolute; firmness of purpose.


Then that took me to another definition that I wanted to be sure about. What does it mean to be resolute (resuelto)? It is an adjective that describes a person who is: firmly resolved or determined; set in purpose or opinion; characterized by firmness and determination, as the temper, spirit, actions, etc.

A story about resolute people

That lead me then, to our reading for today. This story about Mary and Joseph taking Jesus to be presented at the temple is, to me, a story about resolute people. These are people that are definitely resolved or determined to do certain things. They are set on a specific purpose to do something they feel God has called them to do.

First, there are Joseph and Mary. We see them as examples of people who are obedient to the law from Moses. They follow the Torah and take Jesus to the temple to be presented to the Lord. This should not surprise us. We have seen them obeying God’s purposes from the beginning of the Gospel. They name their son Jesus. Luke takes care in presenting the couple as obedient to God’s revelation and as people who are faithful to God’s purposes. So we could say that they are presented as resolute. They have understood their places in God’s plans and they follow God’s will for their lives and for their baby.

Then there is Simeon. We is described as righteous and devout. He eagerly anticipates the restoration of Israel. The Holy Spirit is with him, and it is revealed that he won't die before he sees the Christ. He could also be construed as resolute. I can imagine him going to the temple, praying, waiting… waiting patiently for the time where his eyes will see the Messiah. Waiting requires resolution and intentionality. People don't usually like waiting. But he waits! And when he sees the Christ, his first words are telling: “Now, master, let your servant go in peace according to your word, because my eyes have seen your salvation.” This request can have two meanings according to the biblical erudition. It can mean “let me die” or “release me from this vigil”. This vigil speaks about a resolute man that has his eyes open to God’s revelation. The Holy Spirit has guided him to this moment, and now the moment has arrived. His vigil has been fulfilled… and his message has been given.

And last but not least, there is Anna. Anna is described as a prophet, as very old, and as a widow. It is also stated that she NEVER left the temple but worshipped God with fasting and prayer night and day. Prophets are messengers that are also in a vigil… listening for God’s words so that they can share them with God’s people. And Anna is presented here as a prophet, and is not in an stereotypical woman's role. Note that Simeon is the one that takes the baby in his arms… Anna does not. Simeon is the one that has the conversation with the parents… Anna does not. Anna is a prophet… therefore she approaches the couple and begins to praise God and to speak about Jesus to everyone who was waiting, like Simeon, for the redemption of Jerusalem. She is resolute. She is determined to share the news of God’s salvation through this child to anyone that wants to hear, and so she does, fulfilling her role as God's messenger.

We see a desire to be faithful to God in all of these people. We see them as people who want to follow God’s purposes and to be obedient, in different ways to God’s revelation. They are resolute to be the people that God wants them to be and to live in a way that gives honor and glory to God.

A surprise

You would think that after all this raucous, Jesus would be known across the land. But William R. Herzog notes that the passage ends on a surprising note. The family returns home. God seems to put a pause on the revelation. He says “for the moment, people will return to the ordinary circumstances of their lives”. But that is not true, is it? There is a gift with this ending. God does not put a pause. Herzog states that people will be able to live a new expectancy and confidence in the fulfillment of God’s purposes. God has given people the confidence to continue being firmly resolved or determined. They can be firm and determined, because they have seen God’s purpose.

The surprise for us today is that once again, we have witness the fullfilment of God’s purpose. A child has been born. We are in the midst of the twelve days of Christmas, twelve days that should go beyond the two turtle doves and serve as a time to reinforce our resolution for the rest of the year.

This Christmas time should be a time to be resolute… to be resolute in listening for God’s daily revelations in our lives, to be resolute to obey God’s revelations and to be faithful to God’s purposes. It is also a time to strengthen our voices and to be resolute in our sharing the good news with others, like Anna did… like Simeon did.

Number 44

In that article that I mentioned before, resolution number 44 is “Pick a theme for the year”. The explanation? “If you’re starting to feel like this whole 'resolution' thing isn’t for you, try sticking to a theme instead. Instead of picking a goal, pick a word you want to abide by for 2018. It could be “brave” or “confident” or “compassionate.” Whatever you want to start doing ― or being ― more of. 

 So… I have a proposition for you… Pick “resolute” as your word for 2018. I feel like this last year there have been too much antonyms for this word… contrary adjectives like “afraid”, “complacent” “irresolute” “submissive” “surrender” or “cautious”. Let us abide to this word “resolute”… trying to follow the examples of Mary, Joseph, Simeon and Anna. After all, none of them got to be resolute depending on their own strengths and abilities, but were able to be resolute because they were able to live a new expectancy and confidence in the fulfillment of God’s purposes. We have heard the stories of fulfillment once again… let us be resolute in our faithfulness to God’s will for our lives. And be resolute in raising your voice of proclamation: our eyes have seen salvation. 

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

One talent? Really?

Sermon written for Thirty-Third Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A), based on Matthew 25: 14-30

A PENNY TO MY NAME
Idina Menzel, a singer and actress better known as the voice of Elsa in Frozen, wrote a song called “Penny” a few years back. The song reflects the life of someone asking for help, because she apparently does everything wrong and takes everything the wrong way. The refrain sounds like a prayer one prays when you are afraid that you’ve messed up your life a and the life of others. It says:

“God if you're listening would you have a message sent? 
Cause I need to be a better lover, brother, and a friend. 
God if you're listening would you come up with some change? 
Cause I wake up every morning with a penny to my name.”




A PENNY
A penny… that one coin that is so worthless that if it falls on the ground, we usually don’t make the effort to pick it up. Waking up every morning with a penny to our name maybe means that you don’t have what you even need to get out of bed. 

I thought about this song when I was reflecting on the passage for this morning. I especially thought about this poor guy that receives one talent.

The parable is very familiar. A man is going on a journey, and summons his slaves and entrust property to them. He gives five talents to one, two to another, and one to the third. The interesting part that I had not noticed before is that observation at the end of this part of the parable. It says that they were given the talents “according to their abilities.” 

When I read this… I thought about the guy that received just one talent. The man gave them money according to their abilities. How do you think this man that received just one talent felt? He sees that one receives five. Then the other receives two… and then he receives one. Really? He must have thought. Just one talent?

Then, he probably starts thinking further. “He gave me just one talent… He does not trust me! Besides… what can I do with one talent? The guy reaps where he does not sow, and gathers where he did not scatter seed. He is doing this to trick me. He know that I’m not up to the task! The best thing that I can do is to make a hole and put this on the ground until he returns!”

And then… we know what happens. The other two over achievers go and make investments and bring more. They receive more or less the same praise and the same recompense. But the one talent guy… “You wicked and lazy slave. Throw him in the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

IS IT ABOUT STEWARDSHIP?
Mark Douglas, a professor of Christian Ethics, has an interesting approach to this passage. Every pastor that is in the middle of November as Stewardship month, is preaching on this passage today, because the traditional approach to it is that we have to be good stewards, like the two slaves that multiplied the money.

Douglas then reminds us that the two slaves that are good stewards, are not the center of the story. The protagonists in the story are the Master and the slave… that is not a good steward. Their relationship is at the center of the story.

This particular parable is in the middle of Jesus talking about the coming judgement of how we have spent our time when the kingdom of God comes. Matthew here is telling a story about the end of time, not necessarily about stewardship. 

The slave that has one talent reminds his master that he has a reputation as a bad man. But if he knows that his master has this reputation. Wouldn’t it have made sense to make an effort to multiply his investments? But… the slave’s fear, the slave’s discouragement, get in the way of doing what he is supposed to do.

Douglas ends his observations saying that this passage “is not so much about stewardship… it is about a willingness to resist fear and… to behave in risky and trusting ways, for in so doing we enter into the joy upon the master’s return.”

MAYBE IT IS A LITTLE BIT ABOUT STEWARDSHIP
Sometimes in our life we feel like that third slave with just one talent. We feel like the song, with just one penny to our name. We start focusing in what we don’t have. We let fear stand in the way of what we could give. And we make the intentional effort of hiding, of letting a thousand excuses be the hole where we bury our call to obedience and to action.

God has given us that talent… and if we focused on what God has given us… instead of what we don’t have… then we could use that talent, that penny, that one thing that God has given us, for the advancement of the God’s kingdom. (Maybe this passage is a little bit about stewardship after all).

DE TRIPAS, CORAZONES (MAKING DO WITH WHAT WE HAVE)
When I was in Texas, I shared the story of a church in Puerto Rico that had recently suffered a split. Part of the congregation, with their pastor, left to go to the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. The rest of the folks were not sure if they were going to make it as a church. We have a phrase in Spanish that says that they made “de tripas corazones”, which basically means they made do with what they have. 

When Hurricane Maria affected the island, the small church was trying to see what they could do. They did not have the human power to do a lot of things… and they certainly did not have money. But… they had the church building… and they have used the building to host different community efforts that have helped their community.

They used their one talent. They knew what their responsibility was in the coming of the kingdom, and they did not let fear or discouragement to take hold.They took risks. They trusted God. They had one talent, and they used it. And in doing so... they wait upon the master's return with joy.

A LITTLE LIGHT... AND A LITTLE PENNY
Yesterday, in the presbytery meeting we were reminded of a Jewish proverb that says “A little bit of light dispels a lot of darkness”. The slave’s fears and his lack of action lands him in outer darkness. But one talent, can dispel a lot of darkness. 

And as I’m thinking about Idina Menzel’s song again… maybe it is good that we wake up every morning with a penny to our name.  Maybe we are meant to wake up with a penny to our name, because pennies are easier to give. Maybe it is because we have spent all that God has given us, and we are open and willing to receive “some change” to be that little bit of light, that dispels a lot of darkness. May we take risks in joyfully waiting for the Master to come, and may God help us to do so. 







Jesús rompe la ley

Jesús: profeta y rebelde Antes, cuando se hablaba en las iglesias sobre cuál era la meta principal del programa de educación cristiana no e...